On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 22:44:47 +0200
Bart Groeneveld <a...@bartavi.nl> wrote:

> IANA specifies User ports as 1024-49151,
> and Private ports (local/ephemeral/dynamic/w/e) as 49152-65535 [1].
> 
> This means Linux uses 32768-49151 'illegally'.
> This is not just a matter of following specifications:
> IANA actually assigns numbers in this range [1].
> 
> I understand that Linux uses 61000-65535 for masquarading/NAT [2],
> so I left the high value at 60999.
> This means the high value still does not follow the specification,
> but it also doesn't conflict with it.
> 
> This change will effectively halve the available ephemeral ports,
> increasing the risk of port exhaustion. But:
> a) I don't think that warrants ignoring standards.
>       Consider for example setting up a (corporate) firewall blocking
>       all unknown external services.
>       It will only allow outgoing trafiic at port 80,443 and 49152-65535.
>       A Linux computer behind such a firewall will not be able to connect
>       to *any* external service *half of the time*.
>       Of course, the firewall can be adjusted to also allow 32768-49151,
>       but that allows computers to use some services against the policy.
> b) It is only an issue with more than 11848 *outgoing* connections.
>       I think that is a niche case (I know, citation needed, but still).
>       If someone finds themselves in such a niche case,
>       they can still modify ip_local_port_range.
> 
> This patch keeps the low and high value at different parity,
> as to optimize port assignment [3].
> 
> [1]: 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.txt
> [2]: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117900026927289
> [3]: See for example commit 1580ab63fc9a03593072cc5656167a75c4f1d173 
> ("tcp/dccp: better use of ephemeral ports in connect()")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bart Groeneveld <a...@bartavi.nl>

Changing the default range impacts existing users. Since Linux has been doing
this for so long, I don't think just because a standards body decided to reserve
some space is sufficient justification to do this.

Reply via email to