Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> writes: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020, Lee Jones wrote: > >> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020, Kalle Valo wrote: >> >> > Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote: >> > >> > > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): >> > > >> > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c:279: warning: Function >> > > parameter or member 'ptr_' not described in 'wmi_buffer_block' >> > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c:279: warning: Excess >> > > function parameter 'ptr' description in 'wmi_buffer_block' >> > > >> > > Cc: Maya Erez <me...@codeaurora.org> >> > > Cc: Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org> >> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net> >> > > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> >> > > Cc: linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org >> > > Cc: wil6...@qti.qualcomm.com >> > > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org >> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> >> > >> > Failed to apply: >> > >> > error: patch failed: drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c:266 >> > error: drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c: patch does not apply >> > stg import: Diff does not apply cleanly >> > >> > Patch set to Changes Requested. >> >> Are you applying them in order? >> >> It may be affected by: >> >> wireless: ath: wil6210: wmi: Fix formatting and demote >> non-conforming function headers >> >> I'll also rebase onto the latest -next and resubmit. > > I just rebased all 3 sets onto the latest -next (next-20200827) > without issue. Not sure what problem you're seeing. Did you apply > the first set before attempting the second?
I can't remember the order, patchwork sorts them based on the order they have been submitted and that's what I usually use. Do note that there's a separate tree for drivers in drivers/net/wireless/ath: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/ And it takes a week or two before patches go to linux-next. -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
