On 8/24/20 1:54 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > Arguably, pretty much all of the code here should go into libnetlink > then, since the kernel facility was expressly written in a way that > would allow dumping out arbitrary (not just generic netlink) policies, > just needs wiring up in the appropriate netlink family (or perhaps some > additional "policy netlink" family?)
good point. > > I can make that change, but I sort of assumed it'd be nicer to do that > when someone else actually picked it up. I think it would be better to put this into libnetlink from the start.
