From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:16:42 +0900 (JST)
> I hoped we could save some memory per fib6_node, > but I'm fine with it. I know, I did not want to add it either :( Speaking of which, several of the potential fixes for the rt6_probe() deadlock require adding even more things to the fib6_node (a linked list which some workqueue or similar can run, or a timer, etc.). So, I'm trying to figure out a way to get the rt6_probe() to run outside of the per-table rwlock without adding more state to fib6_node. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
