On 8/17/20 11:31 AM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 11:37 PM Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 2:29 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Or put it into struct ipv6_stub? >> Hi Cong, >> >> That could be one way. We may do it when this new function becomes more >> common. >> By now, I think it's okay to make TIPC depend on IPV6 || IPV6=n. > > I am not a fan of IPV6=m, but disallowing it for one symbol seems > too harsh.
Hi, Maybe I'm not following you, but this doesn't disallow IPV6=m. It just restricts how TIPC can be built, so that TIPC=y and IPV6=m cannot happen together, which causes a build error. -- ~Randy
