The way we define the phase (the difference between the time of the
signal's rising edge, and the closest integer multiple of the period),
it doesn't make sense to have a phase value equal or larger than 1
period.

So deny these settings coming from the user.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olte...@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v3:
Adjust the comments to cover the equality case.

Changes in v2:
Be sure to also deny the case where the period is equal to the phase.
This represents a 360 degree offset, which is equivalent to a phase of
zero, so it should be rejected on the grounds of having a modulo
equivalent as well.

 drivers/ptp/ptp_chardev.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_chardev.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_chardev.c
index e0e6f85966e1..af3bc65c4595 100644
--- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_chardev.c
+++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_chardev.c
@@ -218,6 +218,19 @@ long ptp_ioctl(struct posix_clock *pc, unsigned int cmd, 
unsigned long arg)
                                        break;
                                }
                        }
+                       if (perout->flags & PTP_PEROUT_PHASE) {
+                               /*
+                                * The phase should be specified modulo the
+                                * period, therefore anything equal or larger
+                                * than 1 period is invalid.
+                                */
+                               if (perout->phase.sec > perout->period.sec ||
+                                   (perout->phase.sec == perout->period.sec &&
+                                    perout->phase.nsec >= 
perout->period.nsec)) {
+                                       err = -ERANGE;
+                                       break;
+                               }
+                       }
                } else if (cmd == PTP_PEROUT_REQUEST) {
                        req.perout.flags &= PTP_PEROUT_V1_VALID_FLAGS;
                        req.perout.rsv[0] = 0;
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to