On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 12:34:47AM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 05/08/2020 00:07, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 11:56:12PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 31/07/2020 13:06, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> > > > On Thu Jul 30 2020, Petr Machata wrote:
> > > > > Kurt Kanzenbach <k...@linutronix.de> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -107,6 +107,37 @@ unsigned int ptp_classify_raw(const struct
> > > > > > sk_buff *skb)
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ptp_classify_raw);
> > > > > > +struct ptp_header *ptp_parse_header(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned
> > > > > > int type)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + u8 *data = skb_mac_header(skb);
> > > > > > + u8 *ptr = data;
> > > > >
> > > > > One of the "data" and "ptr" variables is superfluous.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah. Can be shortened to u8 *ptr = skb_mac_header(skb);
> > >
> > > Actually usage of skb_mac_header(skb) breaks CPTS RX time-stamping on
> > > am571x platform PATCH 6.
> > >
> > > The CPSW RX timestamp requested after full packet put in SKB, but
> > > before calling eth_type_trans().
> > >
> > > So, skb->data pints on Eth header, but skb_mac_header() return garbage.
> > >
> > > Below diff fixes it for me.
> >
> > However, that's likely to break everyone else.
> >
> > For example, anyone calling this from the mii_timestamper rxtstamp()
> > method, the skb will have been classified with the MAC header pushed
> > and restored, so skb->data points at the network header.
> >
> > Your change means that ptp_parse_header() expects the MAC header to
> > also be pushed.
> >
> > Is it possible to adjust CPTS?
> >
> > Looking at:
> > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c... yes.
> > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c... yes.
> > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/netcp_core.c... unclear.
> >
> > If not, maybe cpts should remain unconverted - I don't see any reason
> > to provide a generic function for one user.
> >
>
> Could it be an option to pass "u8 *ptr" instead of "const struct sk_buff
> *skb" as
> input parameter to ptp_parse_header()?
It needs to read from the buffer, and in order to do that, it needs to
validate that the buffer contains sufficient data. So, at minimum it
needs to be a pointer and size of valid data.
I was thinking about suggesting that as a core function, with a wrapper
for the existing interface.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
