> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> > Sent: 03 August 2020 15:58 > To: Madalin Bucur (OSS) <madalin.bu...@oss.nxp.com> > Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <li...@armlinux.org.uk>; Vikas Singh > <vikas.si...@puresoftware.com>; f.faine...@gmail.com; hkallwe...@gmail.com; > netdev@vger.kernel.org; Calvin Johnson (OSS) <calvin.john...@oss.nxp.com>; > kuldip dwivedi <kuldip.dwiv...@puresoftware.com>; Vikas Singh > <vikas.si...@nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: phy: Associate device node with fixed PHY > > > I see you agree that there were and there will be many changes for a > while, > > It's not a complaint, I know hot it works, it's just a decision based on > > required effort vs features offered vs user requirements. Lately it's > been > > time consuming to try to fix things in this area. > > So the conclusion to all this that you are unwilling to use the > correct API for this, which would be phylink, and the SFP code. So: > > NACK > > Andrew
You've rejected a generic change - ACPI support for fixed link. The discussion above is just an example of how it could have been (mis-)used. Are you rejecting the general case or just the particular one? Madalin
