Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:15 AM Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de> wrote: > > > > In MPTCP case, we want to know if we should store a new token id or if we > > should try best-effort only (cookie case). > > > > This allows the MPTCP core to detect when it should elide the storage > > of the generated MPTCP token. > > > > It seems you add later another patch, introducing cookie_tcp_reqsk_alloc() > > We could rename req->cookie_ts bit to req->syncookie in order to not > change function signatures.
Ok, I will update patch #1 to do a rename instead of removing cookie_ts bit. I will keep the change in output path to check synack_type instead of cookie_ts.
