On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:15 PM Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Adding test to for sets resolve_btfids. We're checking that
> testing set gets properly resolved and sorted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> index 101785b49f7e..cc90aa244285 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,15 @@ BTF_ID(struct, S)
> BTF_ID(union, U)
> BTF_ID(func, func)
>
> +BTF_SET_START(test_set)
> +BTF_ID(typedef, S)
> +BTF_ID(typedef, T)
> +BTF_ID(typedef, U)
> +BTF_ID(struct, S)
> +BTF_ID(union, U)
> +BTF_ID(func, func)
> +BTF_SET_END(test_set)
> +
> static int
> __resolve_symbol(struct btf *btf, int type_id)
> {
> @@ -126,5 +135,29 @@ int test_resolve_btfids(void)
> }
> }
>
> + /* Check BTF_SET_START(test_set) IDs */
> + for (i = 0; i < test_set.cnt && !ret; i++) {
nit: usual we just do `goto err_out;` instead of complicating exit
condition in a for loop
> + bool found = false;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(test_symbols); j++) {
> + if (test_symbols[j].id != test_set.ids[i])
> + continue;
> + found = true;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + ret = CHECK(!found, "id_check",
> + "ID %d for %s not found in test_symbols\n",
> + test_symbols[j].id, test_symbols[j].name);
j == ARRAY_SIZE(test_symbols), you probably meant to get
test_set.ids[i] instead of test_symbol name/id?
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> +
> + if (i > 0) {
> + ret = CHECK(test_set.ids[i - 1] > test_set.ids[i],
nit: >= would be the invalid condition
> + "sort_check",
> + "test_set is not sorted\n");
> + }
> + }
> +
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.25.4
>
