On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:54:45AM +0100, Patrick McHardy ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > We would already do that on init.
> > Some things become very confused, when nl_table is not used to store
> > netlink sockets.
>
>
> Its unnecessary, but I don't understand what the problem is.
> Why would it be NULL and what gets confused?
There is no problem as-is, but I implement unified cache for different
sockets (currently tcp/udp/raw and netlink are supported), which does
not use that table, so I currently wrap all access code into special
ifdefs, this one can be wrapped too, but since it is not needed, it
saves couple of lines of code.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
