On 23 Jul 2020, at 13:06, Hillf Danton wrote:

Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:27:19 -0700
syzbot found the following issue on:
 <SNIP>

Fixes: eac87c413bf9 ("net: openvswitch: reorder masks array based on usage") by moving cancel_delayed_work_sync() in to the rcu cb, therefore out of ovs lock. To facilitate that, add a flag in datapath to inform the kworker that
there is no more work needed.

I was thinking of re-working the patch and move the handling to the “struct ovs_net” instead of the datapath. This way the rebalance worker can rebalance all datapaths in the netns. Than I can move cancel_delayed_work_sync() from __dp_destroy()
to ovs_exit_net(), i.e. outside the ovs lock scope.

However, your fix would be way less intrusive. Are you planning on sending it as a patch? If so, maybe add a comment around the called_rcu variable to be more clear where it’s used for, or maybe rename it to something like called_destory_rcu?

If you think my approach would be better let me know, and I work on a patch.

Feedback anyone?

--- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.h
+++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.h
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct datapath {

        u32 max_headroom;

+       int called_rcu;
        /* Switch meters. */
        struct dp_meter_table meter_tbl;

--- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ static void destroy_dp_rcu(struct rcu_he
 {
        struct datapath *dp = container_of(rcu, struct datapath, rcu);

+       cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dp->masks_rebalance);
        ovs_flow_tbl_destroy(&dp->table);
        free_percpu(dp->stats_percpu);
        kfree(dp->ports);
@@ -1760,11 +1761,9 @@ static void __dp_destroy(struct datapath
         */
        ovs_dp_detach_port(ovs_vport_ovsl(dp, OVSP_LOCAL));

+       dp->called_rcu = true;
        /* RCU destroy the flow table */
        call_rcu(&dp->rcu, destroy_dp_rcu);
-
-       /* Cancel remaining work. */
-       cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dp->masks_rebalance);
 }

static int ovs_dp_cmd_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
@@ -2356,6 +2355,8 @@ static void ovs_dp_masks_rebalance(struc
        ovs_flow_masks_rebalance(&dp->table);
        ovs_unlock();

+       if (dp->called_rcu)
+               return;
        schedule_delayed_work(&dp->masks_rebalance,
                              msecs_to_jiffies(DP_MASKS_REBALANCE_INTERVAL));
 }

Reply via email to