From: Vincent Duvert <vincent.l...@duvert.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:37:52 +0200
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static struct sock *atalk_search_socket(struct sockaddr_at
> *to,
> struct atalk_iface *atif)
> {
> struct sock *s;
> + struct sock *def_socket = NULL;
>
> read_lock_bh(&atalk_sockets_lock);
> sk_for_each(s, &atalk_sockets) {
Please use reverse christmas tree ordering for local variables.
Also, please post the next revision of this patch series with
a proper "[PATCH net 0/N]" header posting, explaining what the
patch series is doing, how it is doing it, and why it is
doing it this way.
Your Subject lines should all also indicate the proper target GIT tree
your changes are for. This is indicated in the "[]" bracket area,
as either 'net' or 'net-next', f.e. "[PATCH net 1/2] ..."
Thank you.
