On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 01:10:31AM +0300, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Reformat structs and macros definitions a bit prior to making functional
> changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aloba...@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <irussk...@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kalderon <michal.kalde...@marvell.com>
> include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h | 126 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h b/include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h
> index 7071dc92b4e2..087073517c09 100644
> +++ b/include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h
> @@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ enum qed_chain_mode {
> };
>
> enum qed_chain_use_mode {
> - QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_PRODUCE, /* Chain starts empty */
> - QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME, /* Chain starts full */
> - QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME_PRODUCE, /* Chain starts empty */
> + QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_PRODUCE, /* Chain starts empty */
> + QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME, /* Chain starts full */
> + QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME_PRODUCE, /* Chain starts empty */
> };
>
> enum qed_chain_cnt_type {
> @@ -40,84 +40,86 @@ enum qed_chain_cnt_type {
> };
>
> struct qed_chain_next {
> - struct regpair next_phys;
> - void *next_virt;
> + struct regpair next_phys;
> + void *next_virt;
> };
I'm surprised this is considered an improvement??
I've been encouring people to go the other way, maintaining vertical alignment
is
harmful to backporting..
Jason
