Hello!

On 7/17/20 10:12 PM, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:

>>>>> The MediaTek Bluetooth platform (MT6630 etc.) has a peculiar 
>>>>> implementation
>>>>> for the eSCO/SCO connection via BT/EDR: the host controller returns error
>>>>> code 0x20 (LMP feature not supported) for HCI_Setup_Synchronous_Connection
>>>>> (0x0028) command without actually trying to setup connection with a remote
>>>>> device in case such device (like Digma BT-14 headset) didn't advertise its
>>>>> supported features.  Even though this doesn't break compatibility with the
>>>>> Bluetooth standard it breaks the compatibility with the Hands-Free Profile
>>>>> (HFP).
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch returns the compatibility with the HFP profile and actually
>>>>> tries to check all available connection parameters despite of the specific
>>>>> MediaTek implementation. Without it one was unable to establish eSCO/SCO
>>>>> connection with some headsets.
[...]
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtyl...@omprussia.ru>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This patch is against the 'bluetooth-next.git' repo.
>>>>>
>>>>> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c |    8 ++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> Index: bluetooth-next/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> --- bluetooth-next.orig/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
>>>>> +++ bluetooth-next/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
>>>>> @@ -2187,6 +2187,13 @@ static void hci_cs_setup_sync_conn(struc
>>>>>   if (acl) {
>>>>>           sco = acl->link;
>>>>>           if (sco) {
>>>>> +                 if (status == 0x20 && /* Unsupported LMP Parameter 
>>>>> value */
>>>>> +                     sco->out) {
> 
>     Actually, I was expecting that you'd tell me to create a HCI quirk for 
> this situation.
> I have a patch doing that but I haven't been able to locate the driver in 
> which to set this
> quirk flag...

   And that's no wonder! The BT driver that needs this patch is out-of-tree 
(and not even open
source, it seems) as we have finally ascertained with Ildar... Is there any 
interest in the
"preparatory" patch that lowers the indentation levels in 
hci_cs_setup_sync_conn()?

[...]

MBR, Sergei

Reply via email to