On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 03:42:35PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > Now in ip(6)_vti and xfrm interface tunnel support, it uses the > same xfrm(6)_tunnel object to handle for AF_NET and AF_INET6 by > registering it twice. > > However the xfrm(6)_tunnel object is linked into a list with its > 'next' pointer. The second registering will cause its 'next' > pointer to be overwritten, and break the list. > > So this patchset is to add a new xfrm(6)_tunnel object for each > of them and register it, although its members are the same with > the old one. > > Xin Long (3): > ip_vti: not register vti_ipip_handler twice > ip6_vti: not register vti_ipv6_handler twice > xfrm: interface: not xfrmi_ipv6/ipip_handler twice
Applied, thanks Xin!
