On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:20:27 +0000 Kiyanovski, Arthur wrote: > > This commit actually enables a feature after it was fixed by previous > > commits, > > therefore we thought that net-next could be a right place. But if you think > > it > > should go to net, we'll go ahead and resubmit it there. Thanks for your > > comments. > > Jakub, > I’ve removed the patch from v2 but it seems to me there was some > miscommunication and IMO the correct place for the patch should be > net-next. This feature was actually turned off until now, and this > patch turns it on. It is not a bug fix, it is actually a feature. Do > you have an objection to me returning this patch (with this > explanation in the commit message) to this patchsets V3?
Sounds good, the commit message makes all the difference.
