> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 8:12 PM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Cc: Michael, Alice <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Brady, Alan
> <[email protected]>; Burra, Phani R <[email protected]>; Hay,
> Joshua A <[email protected]>; Chittim, Madhu
> <[email protected]>; Linga, Pavan Kumar
> <[email protected]>; Skidmore, Donald C
> <[email protected]>; Brandeburg, Jesse
> <[email protected]>; Samudrala, Sridhar
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [net-next v3 12/15] iecm: Add singleq TX/RX
> 
> On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 19:07 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > From: Alice Michael <[email protected]>
> >
> > Implement legacy single queue model for TX/RX flows.
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iecm/iecm_singleq_txrx.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iecm/iecm_singleq_txrx.c
> []
> > @@ -145,7 +508,63 @@ static void iecm_rx_singleq_csum(struct iecm_queue
> *rxq, struct sk_buff *skb,
> >                              struct iecm_singleq_base_rx_desc *rx_desc,
> >                              u8 ptype)
> >  {
> []
> > +   if (ipv4 && (rx_error & (BIT(IECM_RX_BASE_DESC_ERROR_IPE_S) |
> > +                            BIT(IECM_RX_BASE_DESC_ERROR_EIPE_S))))
> > +           goto checksum_fail;
> > +   else if (ipv6 && (rx_status &
> > +            (BIT(IECM_RX_BASE_DESC_STATUS_IPV6EXADD_S))))
> > +           goto checksum_fail;
> > +
> > +   /* check for L4 errors and handle packets that were not able to be
> > +    * checksummed due to arrival speed
> > +    */
> > +   if (rx_error & BIT(IECM_RX_BASE_DESC_ERROR_L3L4E_S))
> > +           goto checksum_fail;
> []
> > +checksum_fail:
> > +   dev_dbg(rxq->dev, "RX Checksum not available\n");
> 
> If there's an actual checksum arrival speed issue, then likely this dbg output
> should be ratelimited too.
> 

Yeah this is an issue.  I think we want to add a counter here instead of 
printing anything out anyway.  Will fix.

Alan

Reply via email to