On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:19:42PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 14:08, Russell King - ARM Linux admin > <li...@armlinux.org.uk> wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > So, I ask again, what practical use and benefit does restarting the > > configuration exchange on a SGMII or USXGMII link have? Give me a real > > life use case where there's a problem with a link that this can solve. > > > > You are pushing the discussion in an area that to me is pretty > insignificant, and where I did _not_ want to go. I said: > > > This is > > probably OK, I can't come up with a situation where it might be useful for > > the > > MAC PCS to clear its cache of link state and ask for a new tx_config_reg. So > > remove this code. > > I was going to remove this code in the first place, it's just that you > didn't like the justification in the initial commit message. Fine. So > I asked you if this new commit message is OK. You said: > > > This is going over the top > > So let's cut this short: we agree about everything now, hardware > behavior and software behavior. Could you edit my commit message in a > way that you agree with, and paste it here so that I could include it > in v2?
No. Too busy. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
