On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:19:38AM +0800, we...@ucloud.cn wrote: > From: wenxu <we...@ucloud.cn> > > In the function __flow_block_indr_cleanup, The match stataments > this->cb_priv == cb_priv is always false, the flow_block_cb->cb_priv > is totally different data with the flow_indr_dev->cb_priv. > > Store the representor cb_priv to the flow_block_cb->indr.cb_priv in > the driver. > > Fixes: 1fac52da5942 ("net: flow_offload: consolidate indirect flow_block > infrastructure") > Signed-off-by: wenxu <we...@ucloud.cn>
Hi Wenxu, I wonder if this can be resolved by using the cb_ident field of struct flow_block_cb. I observe that mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_block() seems to be the only call-site where the value of the cb_ident parameter of flow_block_cb_alloc() is per-block rather than per-device. So part of my proposal is to change that. The other part of my proposal is to make use of cb_ident in __flow_block_indr_cleanup(). Which does seem to match the intended purpose of cb_ident. Perhaps it would also be good to document what the intended purpose of cb_ident (and the other fields of struct flow_block_cb) is. Compile tested only. diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/tc.c index a62bcf0cf512..4de6fcae5252 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/tc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/tc.c @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_block(struct net_device *netdev, list_add(&indr_priv->list, &rpriv->uplink_priv.tc_indr_block_priv_list); - block_cb = flow_block_cb_alloc(setup_cb, indr_priv, indr_priv, + block_cb = flow_block_cb_alloc(setup_cb, rpriv, indr_priv, mlx5e_rep_indr_block_unbind); if (IS_ERR(block_cb)) { list_del(&indr_priv->list); diff --git a/net/core/flow_offload.c b/net/core/flow_offload.c index b288d2f03789..d281fb182894 100644 --- a/net/core/flow_offload.c +++ b/net/core/flow_offload.c @@ -373,14 +373,13 @@ int flow_indr_dev_register(flow_indr_block_bind_cb_t *cb, void *cb_priv) EXPORT_SYMBOL(flow_indr_dev_register); static void __flow_block_indr_cleanup(void (*release)(void *cb_priv), - void *cb_priv, + void *cb_ident, struct list_head *cleanup_list) { struct flow_block_cb *this, *next; list_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &flow_block_indr_list, indr.list) { - if (this->release == release && - this->cb_priv == cb_priv) { + if (this->release == release && this->cb_ident == cb_ident) { list_move(&this->indr.list, cleanup_list); return; }