Le 05.06.2020 à 00:55, David Miller a écrit :
From: Valentin Longchamp <valen...@longchamp.me>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 23:21:13 +0200
Remove dev_watchdog_up() that directly called __netdev_watchdog_up() and
rename dev_watchdog_down() to __netdev_watchdog_down() for symmetry.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valen...@longchamp.me>
---
net/sched/sch_generic.c | 11 +++--------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
index 2efd5b61acef..f3cb740a2941 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
@@ -465,12 +465,7 @@ void __netdev_watchdog_up(struct net_device *dev)
}
}
-static void dev_watchdog_up(struct net_device *dev)
-{
- __netdev_watchdog_up(dev);
-}
-
-static void dev_watchdog_down(struct net_device *dev)
+static void __netdev_watchdog_down(struct net_device *dev)
This patch will not apply if I apply your symbol export patch because
the context above this function will be different.
Please don't do this.
Yeah, I didn't know how to handle this properly: I kept both patches
separated because the symbol export should go to stable and this one not.
Is that OK to have only a ("initial") subset of a series aimed for stable ?
