On 02/06/2020 1:12, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun, 31 May 2020 15:06:28 +0300 Boris Pismenny wrote:
>> On 30/05/2020 0:50, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>
>>> IIUC every ooo packet causes a resync request in your
>>> implementation - is that true?
>>>   
>> No, only header loss. We never required a resync per OOO packet. I'm
>> not sure why would you think that.
> I mean until device is back in sync every frame kicks off
> resync_update_sn() and tries to queue the work, right?
>
Nope, only the first frame triggers resync_update_sn, so as to keep the process 
efficient and avoid spamming the system with resync requests. Per-flow, the 
device will try again to trigger resync_update_sn only if it gets out of sync 
due to out-of-sequence record headers.


Reply via email to