On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:37:27 -0800
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:34:17 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:33:05 -0800
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8107
> > > 
> > >            Summary: dev->header_cache_update has a random value
> > >     Kernel Version: 2.6.20
> > >             Status: NEW
> > >           Severity: high
> > >              Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >          Submitter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Distribution: Kernel 2.6.20
> > > 
> > > Problem Description:
> > > 
> > > In struct net_device, there are two fields: hard_header_cache and 
> > > header_cache_update, both of which are function pointers. The third 
> > > field, 
> > > hard_header, is also a function pointer. Whenever hard_header points to a 
> > > valid 
> > > function, both hard_header_cache and header_cache_update should have a 
> > > known 
> > > value, either NULL or a valid function pointer. However, in 
> > > drivers/net/wan/hdlc_cisco.c, in function static int cisco_ioctl(struct 
> > > net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr), where dev->hard_header is assigned a 
> > > valid 
> > > function, and dev->hard_header_cache is assigned a known value (NULL), 
> > > dev-
> > > >header_cache_update is not set to a known value:
> > > 
> > > dev->hard_start_xmit = hdlc->xmit;
> > >         dev->hard_header = cisco_hard_header;
> > >         dev->hard_header_cache = NULL;
> > >         dev->type = ARPHRD_CISCO;
> > >         dev->flags = IFF_POINTOPOINT | IFF_NOARP;
> > >         dev->addr_len = 0;
> > > 
> > > This may cause serious problems when dev->header_cache_update is invoked, 
> > > because it has an uninitialized value.
> > > 
> > > Steps to reproduce:
> > > 
> > > I found this suspicious spot with the help of a code-checking tool.
> > > 
> > 
> > Like this?
> 
> Not necessary, since any network device must already allocated by
> alloc_netdev() and it initializes the whole struct to 0 (NULL).

But ioctl(IF_PROTO_CISCO) can be run multiple times across the lifetime of
a net_device?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to