> From: Yuval Basson <yba...@marvell.com>
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 23:51:26 +0300
> 
> > @@ -1748,24 +1839,26 @@ static int qed_rdma_modify_srq(void
> *rdma_cxt,
> >     u16 opaque_fid, srq_id;
> >     struct qed_bmap *bmap;
> >     u32 returned_id;
> > +   u16 offset;
> >     int rc;
> >
> > -   bmap = &p_hwfn->p_rdma_info->srq_map;
> > +   bmap = qed_rdma_get_srq_bmap(p_hwfn, in_params->is_xrc);
> >     spin_lock_bh(&p_hwfn->p_rdma_info->lock);
> >     rc = qed_rdma_bmap_alloc_id(p_hwfn, bmap, &returned_id);
> >     spin_unlock_bh(&p_hwfn->p_rdma_info->lock);
> >
> >     if (rc) {
> > -           DP_NOTICE(p_hwfn, "failed to allocate srq id\n");
> > +           DP_NOTICE(p_hwfn,
> > +                     "failed to allocate xrc/srq id (is_xrc=%u)\n",
> > +                     in_params->is_xrc);
> >             return rc;
> >     }
> >
> > -   elem_type = QED_ELEM_SRQ;
> > +   elem_type = (in_params->is_xrc) ? (QED_ELEM_XRC_SRQ) :
> (QED_ELEM_SRQ);
> >     rc = qed_cxt_dynamic_ilt_alloc(p_hwfn, elem_type, returned_id);
> >     if (rc)
> >             goto err;
> 
> This "if (rc)" error path will leak 'returned_id' won't it?
I don't think so.. this allocation is not part of this patch. It is handled 
here - 
err:
        spin_lock_bh(&p_hwfn->p_rdma_info->lock);
        qed_bmap_release_id(p_hwfn, bmap, returned_id);
        spin_unlock_bh(&p_hwfn->p_rdma_info->lock);

Reply via email to