On Wed,  6 May 2020 08:22:19 +0200
Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> wrote:

> All three callers really should try the explicit kernel and user
> copies instead.  One has already deprecated the somewhat dangerous
> either kernel or user address concept, the other two still need to
> follow up eventually.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>

This looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>

Thank you,

> ---
>  include/linux/uaccess.h     |  1 -
>  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c    | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c |  5 ++++-
>  mm/maccess.c                | 39 +-----------------------------------
>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> index f8c47395a92df..09d6e358883cc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> @@ -311,7 +311,6 @@ extern long probe_user_read(void *dst, const void __user 
> *src, size_t size);
>  extern long notrace probe_kernel_write(void *dst, const void *src, size_t 
> size);
>  extern long notrace probe_user_write(void __user *dst, const void *src, 
> size_t size);
>  
> -extern long strncpy_from_unsafe(char *dst, const void *unsafe_addr, long 
> count);
>  extern long strncpy_from_kernel_unsafe(char *dst, const void *unsafe_addr,
>                                      long count);
>  extern long strncpy_from_user_unsafe(char *dst, const void __user 
> *unsafe_addr,
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index e4e202f433903..ffe841433caa1 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -229,9 +229,10 @@ bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_common(void *dst, u32 size, 
> const void *unsafe_ptr,
>       int ret = security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ);
>  
>       if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> -             goto out;
> +             goto fail;
> +
>       /*
> -      * The strncpy_from_unsafe_*() call will likely not fill the entire
> +      * The strncpy_from_*_unsafe() call will likely not fill the entire
>        * buffer, but that's okay in this circumstance as we're probing
>        * arbitrary memory anyway similar to bpf_probe_read_*() and might
>        * as well probe the stack. Thus, memory is explicitly cleared
> @@ -239,11 +240,18 @@ bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_common(void *dst, u32 size, 
> const void *unsafe_ptr,
>        * code altogether don't copy garbage; otherwise length of string
>        * is returned that can be used for bpf_perf_event_output() et al.
>        */
> -     ret = compat ? strncpy_from_unsafe(dst, unsafe_ptr, size) :
> -           strncpy_from_kernel_unsafe(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
> -     if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> -out:
> -             memset(dst, 0, size);
> +     ret = strncpy_from_kernel_unsafe(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
> +     if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> +             if (compat)
> +                     ret = strncpy_from_user_unsafe(dst,
> +                                     (__force const void __user *)unsafe_ptr,
> +                                     size);
> +             if (ret < 0)
> +                     goto fail;
> +     }
> +     return 0;
> +fail:
> +     memset(dst, 0, size);
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -321,6 +329,17 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto 
> *bpf_get_probe_write_proto(void)
>       return &bpf_probe_write_user_proto;
>  }
>  
> +#define BPF_STRNCPY_LEN 64
> +
> +static void bpf_strncpy(char *buf, long unsafe_addr)
> +{
> +     buf[0] = 0;
> +     if (strncpy_from_kernel_unsafe(buf, (void *)unsafe_addr,
> +                     BPF_STRNCPY_LEN))
> +             strncpy_from_user_unsafe(buf, (void __user *)unsafe_addr,
> +                             BPF_STRNCPY_LEN);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Only limited trace_printk() conversion specifiers allowed:
>   * %d %i %u %x %ld %li %lu %lx %lld %lli %llu %llx %p %s
> @@ -332,7 +351,7 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_trace_printk, char *, fmt, u32, fmt_size, 
> u64, arg1,
>       int mod[3] = {};
>       int fmt_cnt = 0;
>       u64 unsafe_addr;
> -     char buf[64];
> +     char buf[BPF_STRNCPY_LEN];
>       int i;
>  
>       /*
> @@ -387,10 +406,7 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_trace_printk, char *, fmt, u32, fmt_size, 
> u64, arg1,
>                                       arg3 = (long) buf;
>                                       break;
>                               }
> -                             buf[0] = 0;
> -                             strncpy_from_unsafe(buf,
> -                                                 (void *) (long) unsafe_addr,
> -                                                 sizeof(buf));
> +                             bpf_strncpy(buf, unsafe_addr);
>                       }
>                       continue;
>               }
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> index a7f43c7ec9880..525d12137325c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> @@ -1238,7 +1238,10 @@ fetch_store_string(unsigned long addr, void *dest, 
> void *base)
>        * Try to get string again, since the string can be changed while
>        * probing.
>        */
> -     ret = strncpy_from_unsafe(__dest, (void *)addr, maxlen);
> +     ret = strncpy_from_kernel_unsafe(__dest, (void *)addr, maxlen);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             ret = strncpy_from_user_unsafe(__dest, (void __user *)addr,
> +                             maxlen);
>       if (ret >= 0)
>               *(u32 *)dest = make_data_loc(ret, __dest - base);
>  
> diff --git a/mm/maccess.c b/mm/maccess.c
> index 11563129cd490..cbd9d668aa46e 100644
> --- a/mm/maccess.c
> +++ b/mm/maccess.c
> @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
>  
>  static long __probe_kernel_read(void *dst, const void *src, size_t size,
>               bool strict);
> -static long __strncpy_from_unsafe(char *dst, const void *unsafe_addr,
> -             long count, bool strict);
>  
>  bool __weak probe_kernel_read_allowed(void *dst, const void *unsafe_src,
>               size_t size, bool strict)
> @@ -156,35 +154,6 @@ long probe_user_write(void __user *dst, const void *src, 
> size_t size)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * strncpy_from_unsafe: - Copy a NUL terminated string from unsafe address.
> - * @dst:   Destination address, in kernel space.  This buffer must be at
> - *         least @count bytes long.
> - * @unsafe_addr: Unsafe address.
> - * @count: Maximum number of bytes to copy, including the trailing NUL.
> - *
> - * Copies a NUL-terminated string from unsafe address to kernel buffer.
> - *
> - * On success, returns the length of the string INCLUDING the trailing NUL.
> - *
> - * If access fails, returns -EFAULT (some data may have been copied
> - * and the trailing NUL added).
> - *
> - * If @count is smaller than the length of the string, copies @count-1 bytes,
> - * sets the last byte of @dst buffer to NUL and returns @count.
> - *
> - * Same as strncpy_from_kernel_unsafe() except that for architectures with
> - * not fully separated user and kernel address spaces this function also 
> works
> - * for user address tanges.
> - *
> - * DO NOT USE THIS FUNCTION - it is broken on architectures with entirely
> - * separate kernel and user address spaces, and also a bad idea otherwise.
> - */
> -long strncpy_from_unsafe(char *dst, const void *unsafe_addr, long count)
> -{
> -     return __strncpy_from_unsafe(dst, unsafe_addr, count, false);
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * strncpy_from_kernel_unsafe: - Copy a NUL terminated string from unsafe
>   *                            address.
> @@ -204,12 +173,6 @@ long strncpy_from_unsafe(char *dst, const void 
> *unsafe_addr, long count)
>   * sets the last byte of @dst buffer to NUL and returns @count.
>   */
>  long strncpy_from_kernel_unsafe(char *dst, const void *unsafe_addr, long 
> count)
> -{
> -     return __strncpy_from_unsafe(dst, unsafe_addr, count, true);
> -}
> -
> -static long __strncpy_from_unsafe(char *dst, const void *unsafe_addr,
> -             long count, bool strict)
>  {
>       mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
>       const void *src = unsafe_addr;
> @@ -217,7 +180,7 @@ static long __strncpy_from_unsafe(char *dst, const void 
> *unsafe_addr,
>  
>       if (unlikely(count <= 0))
>               return 0;
> -     if (!probe_kernel_read_allowed(dst, unsafe_addr, count, strict))
> +     if (!probe_kernel_read_allowed(dst, unsafe_addr, count, true))
>               return -EFAULT;
>  
>       set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>

Reply via email to