On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 10:59:17AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote: > @@ -6891,6 +6897,7 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_st_ops_relos(struct > bpf_object *obj, > > #define BTF_TRACE_PREFIX "btf_trace_" > #define BTF_LSM_PREFIX "bpf_lsm_" > +#define BTF_ITER_PREFIX "__bpf_iter__" > #define BTF_MAX_NAME_SIZE 128
In the kernel source the prefix doesn't stand out, but on libbpf side it looks inconsistent. May be drop __ prefix and keep one _ in the suffix?
