On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, David Miller wrote: > If you have any further bug fixes or enhancements to FRTO we > can put it there too.
I tried the rate-halving approach in spurious RTO response and it looks really nice indeed. I'll try to also run couple of tests with the undo_cwr(,1) response too in near future to ensure that it doesn't cause immediate breakage with something. Before preparing the submittable spurious RTO responses patch, I would like to know what is the preferred style for the response selector code (I'm controlling the response through frto_response sysctl)? switch? array of function pointers? If array, where to place it (considering the need for forward declarations and mixing of code and data in some approaches)? -- i. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
