From: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>

This was caused by a poor merge conflict resolution on my side. The
"act = &cls->rule->action.entries[0];" assignment was already present in
the code prior to the patch mentioned below.

Fixes: e13c2075280e ("net: dsa: refactor matchall mirred action to separate 
function")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
Forgot to copy the netdev list.

 net/dsa/slave.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
index ba8bf90dc0cc..a7f5fe64c2f3 100644
--- a/net/dsa/slave.c
+++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
@@ -856,20 +856,18 @@ dsa_slave_add_cls_matchall_mirred(struct net_device *dev,
        struct dsa_port *to_dp;
        int err;
 
-       act = &cls->rule->action.entries[0];
-
        if (!ds->ops->port_mirror_add)
                return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-       if (!act->dev)
-               return -EINVAL;
-
        if (!flow_action_basic_hw_stats_check(&cls->rule->action,
                                              cls->common.extack))
                return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
        act = &cls->rule->action.entries[0];
 
+       if (!act->dev)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
        if (!dsa_slave_dev_check(act->dev))
                return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to