Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix probe code to return EPERM if encountered

[Eelco Chaudron]

On 1 May 2020, at 21:16, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 2:56 AM Eelco Chaudron <echau...@redhat.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
>>
>> Let me know, and I sent out a v2.
>
> Yes, that's the split I had in mind, but I'd move
> bpf_object__probe_loading() call directly into bpf_object__load() to
> be the first thing to check. probe_caps() should still be non-failing
> if any feature is missing. Does it make sense?

I think I got it :) I’ll send out a v2 soon…

//Eelco