On Fri, 1 May 2020 21:23:25 +0000 Keller, Jacob E wrote: > > Could you please send the snapshot id just before you return 0 in this > > function, as you offered in v1? I think it would be great to do it like > > that. > > > > Also: Does it make sense to send the snapshot id regardless of > whether it was auto-generated or not?
I may be wrong, but I think sending extra messages via netlink, which user space may not expect based on previous kernel versions is considered uAPI breakage.