Thank you Andrew, I will do that. Sorry for the trouble. Best regards, Laurent
> ----------------------------- Eaton Industries Manufacturing GmbH ~ Registered place of business: Route de la Longeraie 7, 1110, Morges, Switzerland ----------------------------- -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 6:35 PM > To: Badel, Laurent <laurentba...@eaton.com> > Cc: gre...@linuxfoundation.org; fugang.d...@nxp.com; > netdev@vger.kernel.org; f.faine...@gmail.com; hkallwe...@gmail.com; > li...@armlinux.org.uk; richard.leit...@skidata.com; > da...@davemloft.net; alexander.le...@microsoft.com; Quette, Arnaud > <arnaudque...@eaton.com> > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert commit > 1b0a83ac04e383e3bed21332962b90710fcf2828 > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 03:48:56PM +0000, Badel, Laurent wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Thanks for the reply. It's the mainline tree, was 5.6.-rc7 at the time. > > There's no tree mentioned for the ethernet PHY library in the > > maintainers files, but am I expected to test against net/ or net-next/ ? > > I'm happy to do so but should I use rather use net/ since this is more of a > bugfix? > > The netdev FAQ talks about this. You need to submit against net, to David > Miller. > > Andrew
