On 10/12/19 11:22 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
[...]
>>> @@ -1141,13 +1174,12 @@ static struct phy_driver ksphy_driver[] = {
>>> .suspend = genphy_suspend,
>>> .resume = genphy_resume,
>>> }, {
>>> - .phy_id = PHY_ID_KSZ8795,
>>> - .phy_id_mask = MICREL_PHY_ID_MASK,
>>> .name = "Micrel KSZ8795",
>>> /* PHY_BASIC_FEATURES */
>>> .config_init = kszphy_config_init,
>>> .config_aneg = ksz8873mll_config_aneg,
>>> .read_status = ksz8873mll_read_status,
>>> + .match_phy_device = ksz8795_match_phy_device,
>>> .suspend = genphy_suspend,
>>> .resume = genphy_resume,
>>> }, {
>>>
>>
>> Patch needs to be annotated as "net-next".
>> See https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
>>
> Except you consider this a fix, then it would require a Fixes tag and
> should be annotated "net". The question is:
> Do KSZ87xx switches misbehave currently?
Well yes they do, otherwise I won't be sending this fix.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
