On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:07:56AM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > Le 09/10/2019 à 01:10, Guillaume Nault a écrit : > [snip] > > We also need to set .portid and .seq otherwise rtnl_net_fill() builds > > a netlink message with invalid port id and sequence number (as you > > noted in your previous message). > > > Yes you're right. I don't know why, I had in mind that nl msg sent by the > kernel > should have the portid and seq number set to 0. > Will send a v2. > I guess this idea comes from the fact that portid and seq don't carry any meaningful information when the message is sent to a multicast group.
- [PATCH net-next 1/2] netns: move rtnl_net_get_size() and r... Nicolas Dichtel
- Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Ease nsid allocation David Miller
- Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Ease nsid allocation Nicolas Dichtel
- Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Ease nsid allocation David Miller
- Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Ease nsid allocation Guillaume Nault
- Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Ease nsid allocation Nicolas Dichtel
- Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Ease nsid alloca... Guillaume Nault
- [PATCH net] netns: fix NLM_F_ECHO mechanism f... Nicolas Dichtel
- Re: [PATCH net] netns: fix NLM_F_ECHO mec... Guillaume Nault
- Re: [PATCH net] netns: fix NLM_F_ECH... Nicolas Dichtel
- Re: [PATCH net] netns: fix NLM_F... Guillaume Nault
- [PATCH net v2] netns: fix NLM_F_ECHO... Nicolas Dichtel
- Re: [PATCH net v2] netns: fix NL... Guillaume Nault
- Re: [PATCH net v2] netns: fix NL... Jakub Kicinski