On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 03:36:56PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > if (rdma_protocol_iwarp(dev, port_num) && dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
> > > return true;
> > > + if (dev->attrs.max_sgl_rd && dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE &&
> > > + dma_nents > dev->attrs.max_sgl_rd)
> > > + return true;
> >
> > This can be simplified to:
> >
> > if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE &&
> > (rdma_protocol_iwarp(dev, port_num) ||
> > (dev->attrs.max_sgl_rd && dma_nents > dev->attrs.max_sgl_rd)))
> > return true;
>
> I don't think that it simplifies and wanted to make separate checks to
> be separated. For example, rdma_protocol_iwarp() has nothing to do with
> attrs.max_sgl_rd.
The important bit is to have the DMA_FROM_DEVICE check only once, as
we only do the registration for reads with either parameter. So if
you want it more verbose the wya would be:
if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
if (rdma_protocol_iwarp(dev, port_num))
return true;
if (dev->attrs.max_sgl_rd && dma_nents > dev->attrs.max_sgl_rd)
return true;
}