Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 10:40:56AM CEST, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
>From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
>
>With the new notifications mlxsw does not need to handle identical
>routes itself, as this is taken care of by the core IPv4 code.
>
>Instead, mlxsw only needs to take care of inserting and removing routes
>from the device.
>
>Convert mlxsw to use the new IPv4 route notifications and simplify the
>code.
>

[...]


>@@ -6246,9 +6147,10 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event(struct 
>notifier_block *nb,
>               err = mlxsw_sp_router_fib_rule_event(event, info,
>                                                    router->mlxsw_sp);
>               return notifier_from_errno(err);
>-      case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD:
>+      case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD: /* fall through */
>       case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_REPLACE: /* fall through */
>       case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_APPEND:  /* fall through */

Why don't you skip the three above with just return of NOTIFY_DONE?


>+      case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_REPLACE_TMP:
>               if (router->aborted) {
>                       NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "FIB offload was 
> aborted. Not configuring route");
>                       return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
>-- 
>2.21.0
>

Reply via email to