Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> > +struct bpf_map_def {
> > + unsigned int type;
> > + unsigned int key_size;
> > + unsigned int value_size;
> > + unsigned int max_entries;
> > + unsigned int map_flags;
> > + unsigned int inner_map_idx;
> > + unsigned int numa_node;
> > +};
>
> Didn't we agree on no new bpf_map_def ABI in libbpf, and that all
> additions should be BTF-based?
>
> -Toke
>
We use libbpf on pre BTF kernels so in this case I think it makes
sense to add these fields. Having inner_map_idx there should allow
us to remove some other things we have sitting around.
.John
