On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 1:15 AM Carlos Neira <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> New bpf helper bpf_get_ns_current_pid_tgid,
> This helper will return pid and tgid from current task
> which namespace matches dev_t and inode number provided,
> this will allows us to instrument a process inside a container.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Neira <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/bpf/core.c | 1 +
> kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 ++
> 5 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 5b9d22338606..231001475504 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1055,6 +1055,7 @@ extern const struct bpf_func_proto
> bpf_get_local_storage_proto;
> extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_strtol_proto;
> extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_strtoul_proto;
> extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_tcp_sock_proto;
> +extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_ns_current_pid_tgid_proto;
>
> /* Shared helpers among cBPF and eBPF. */
> void bpf_user_rnd_init_once(void);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 77c6be96d676..9272dc8fb08c 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -2750,6 +2750,21 @@ union bpf_attr {
> * **-EOPNOTSUPP** kernel configuration does not enable SYN
> cookies
> *
> * **-EPROTONOSUPPORT** IP packet version is not 4 or 6
> + *
> + * int bpf_get_ns_current_pid_tgid(u32 dev, u64 inum)
> + * Return
> + * A 64-bit integer containing the current tgid and pid from
> current task
Function signature doesn't correspond to the actual return type (int vs u64).
> + * which namespace inode and dev_t matches , and is create as
> such:
> + * *current_task*\ **->tgid << 32 \|**
> + * *current_task*\ **->pid**.
> + *
> + * On failure, the returned value is one of the following:
> + *
> + * **-EINVAL** if dev and inum supplied don't match dev_t and
> inode number
> + * with nsfs of current task.
> + *
> + * **-ENOENT** if /proc/self/ns does not exists.
> + *
> */
[...]
> #include "../../lib/kstrtox.h"
>
> @@ -487,3 +489,33 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_strtoul_proto = {
> .arg4_type = ARG_PTR_TO_LONG,
> };
> #endif
> +
> +BPF_CALL_2(bpf_get_ns_current_pid_tgid, u32, dev, u64, inum)
Just curious, is dev_t officially specified as u32 and is never
supposed to grow bigger? I wonder if accepting u64 might be more
future-proof API here?
> +{
> + struct task_struct *task = current;
> + struct pid_namespace *pidns;
[...]
