From: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykow...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 16:47:00 +0200
>> Removing this is going to break things, you can't just remove a sysctl >> because "oh it was a bad idea to add this, sorry." > > Yeah, I know... but do you have any other suggestions? > > Would you take an alternative to make the default wide opened? This also could break things. The horse has left the barn on this one. > Perhaps having it as a non-namespace aware global setting (with a > default of on) would be more palatable? Also could break things. You're going to have to change this in a way such that the administrator has to explicitly ask for the new behavior.
