sorry forget cc to jiri.

On 9/19/2019 4:37 PM, we...@ucloud.cn wrote:
> From: wenxu <we...@ucloud.cn>
>
> A vxlan or gretap device offload through indr block methord. If the device
> successfully bind with a real hw through indr block call, It also add
> nooffloadcnt counter. This counter will lead the rule add failed in
> fl_hw_replace_filter-->tc_setup_cb_call with skip_sw flags.
>
> In the tc_setup_cb_call will check the nooffloaddevcnt and skip_sw flags
> as following:
> if (block->nooffloaddevcnt && err_stop)
>         return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> So with this patch, if the indr block call success, it will not modify
> the nooffloaddevcnt counter.
>
> Fixes: 7f76fa36754b ("net: sched: register callbacks for indirect tc block 
> binds")
> Signed-off-by: wenxu <we...@ucloud.cn>
> ---
> v3: rebase to the net
>
>  net/sched/cls_api.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> index 32577c2..c980127 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> @@ -607,11 +607,11 @@ static void tc_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd(struct 
> net_device *dev,
>       tc_indr_block_ing_cmd(dev, block, cb, cb_priv, command);
>  }
>  
> -static void tc_indr_block_call(struct tcf_block *block,
> -                            struct net_device *dev,
> -                            struct tcf_block_ext_info *ei,
> -                            enum flow_block_command command,
> -                            struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +static int tc_indr_block_call(struct tcf_block *block,
> +                           struct net_device *dev,
> +                           struct tcf_block_ext_info *ei,
> +                           enum flow_block_command command,
> +                           struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>  {
>       struct flow_block_offload bo = {
>               .command        = command,
> @@ -621,10 +621,15 @@ static void tc_indr_block_call(struct tcf_block *block,
>               .block_shared   = tcf_block_shared(block),
>               .extack         = extack,
>       };
> +
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bo.cb_list);
>  
>       flow_indr_block_call(dev, &bo, command);
> -     tcf_block_setup(block, &bo);
> +
> +     if (list_empty(&bo.cb_list))
> +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +     return tcf_block_setup(block, &bo);
>  }
>  
>  static bool tcf_block_offload_in_use(struct tcf_block *block)
> @@ -681,8 +686,6 @@ static int tcf_block_offload_bind(struct tcf_block 
> *block, struct Qdisc *q,
>               goto no_offload_dev_inc;
>       if (err)
>               goto err_unlock;
> -
> -     tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_BIND, extack);
>       up_write(&block->cb_lock);
>       return 0;
>  
> @@ -691,9 +694,10 @@ static int tcf_block_offload_bind(struct tcf_block 
> *block, struct Qdisc *q,
>               err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>               goto err_unlock;
>       }
> +     err = tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_BIND, extack);
> +     if (err)
> +             block->nooffloaddevcnt++;
>       err = 0;
> -     block->nooffloaddevcnt++;
> -     tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_BIND, extack);
>  err_unlock:
>       up_write(&block->cb_lock);
>       return err;
> @@ -706,8 +710,6 @@ static void tcf_block_offload_unbind(struct tcf_block 
> *block, struct Qdisc *q,
>       int err;
>  
>       down_write(&block->cb_lock);
> -     tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND, NULL);
> -
>       if (!dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc)
>               goto no_offload_dev_dec;
>       err = tcf_block_offload_cmd(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND, NULL);
> @@ -717,7 +719,9 @@ static void tcf_block_offload_unbind(struct tcf_block 
> *block, struct Qdisc *q,
>       return;
>  
>  no_offload_dev_dec:
> -     WARN_ON(block->nooffloaddevcnt-- == 0);
> +     err = tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND, NULL);
> +     if (err)
> +             WARN_ON(block->nooffloaddevcnt-- == 0);
>       up_write(&block->cb_lock);
>  }
>  

Reply via email to