On 9/3/19 6:12 PM, Cyrus Sh wrote: > > > On 9/3/19 9:59 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> You could add a random delay to all SYN packets, if you believe your host >> has clock skews. > > And by the way adding delays has its own performance penalties. > You understand your patch has been rejected, right ? You will have to convince people at IETF and get a proper RFC before I even look at the idea. BTW, sending a patch only dealing with IPv4 is also not a good thing.
- Re: [PATCH] Clock-independent TCP ISN generation Cyrus Sh
- Re: [PATCH] Clock-independent TCP ISN generatio... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH] Clock-independent TCP ISN gener... Cyrus Sh
- Re: [PATCH] Clock-independent TCP ISN g... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH] Clock-independent TCP ... Cyrus Sh
- Re: [PATCH] Clock-independent ... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH] Clock-independent ... David Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Clock-independent ... Cyrus Sh
- Re: [PATCH] Clock-independent TCP ISN g... David Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Clock-independent TCP ISN gener... Cyrus Sh
- Re: [PATCH] Clock-independent TCP ISN g... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH] Clock-independent TCP ISN generation kbuild test robot