On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 03:39:53PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 23:44:03 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_osdep.h 
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_osdep.h
> > index a07574bff550..c0c9ce3eab23 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_osdep.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_osdep.h
> > @@ -18,7 +18,12 @@
> >   * actual OS primitives
> >   */
> >  
> > -#define hw_dbg(hw, S, A...)        do {} while (0)
> > +#define hw_dbg(hw, S, A...)                                                
> >         \
> > +do {                                                                       
> >         \
> > +   int domain = pci_domain_nr(((struct i40e_pf *)(hw)->back)->pdev->bus);  
> > \
> > +   pr_debug("i40e %04x:%02x:%02x.%x " S, domain, (hw)->bus.bus_id,         
> > \
> > +            (hw)->bus.device, (hw)->bus.func, ## A);                       
> > \
> 
> This looks like open coded dev_dbg() / dev_namie(), why?

Indeed, thanks for pointing out. I'll fix this and the other patch you
reviewed and resubmit.

I'm not sure what should be the preferred approach here though, just use
dev_dbg to implement this macro or replace all of its occurrence in the
code by dev_dbg?

Jeff, do you have any preference?
> 
> > +} while (0)

Reply via email to