On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:25:12 -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote: > On 8/29/19 4:10 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:27:15 -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote: > >> +static int ionic_get_module_eeprom(struct net_device *netdev, > >> + struct ethtool_eeprom *ee, > >> + u8 *data) > >> +{ > >> + struct ionic_lif *lif = netdev_priv(netdev); > >> + struct ionic_dev *idev = &lif->ionic->idev; > >> + struct ionic_xcvr_status *xcvr; > >> + char tbuf[sizeof(xcvr->sprom)]; > >> + int count = 10; > >> + u32 len; > >> + > >> + /* The NIC keeps the module prom up-to-date in the DMA space > >> + * so we can simply copy the module bytes into the data buffer. > >> + */ > >> + xcvr = &idev->port_info->status.xcvr; > >> + len = min_t(u32, sizeof(xcvr->sprom), ee->len); > >> + > >> + do { > >> + memcpy(data, xcvr->sprom, len); > >> + memcpy(tbuf, xcvr->sprom, len); > >> + > >> + /* Let's make sure we got a consistent copy */ > >> + if (!memcmp(data, tbuf, len)) > >> + break; > >> + > >> + } while (--count); > > Should this return an error if the image was never consistent? > > Sure, how about -EBUSY?
Or EAGAIN ? Not sure