On 28/08/2019 21:56, David Miller wrote: > From: Matthias Brugger <matthias....@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:29:45 +0200 > >> Thanks for taking this patch. For the next time, please make sure that dts[i] >> patches are independent from the binding description, as dts[i] should go >> through my tree. No problem for this round, just saying for the future. > > That's not always possible nor reasonable, to be quite honest. > Right now no case comes to my mind. What would be a case where this is not reasonable or possible? Regards, Matthias
- [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: convert ... René van Dorst
- [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] dt-bindings: net: ethernet: ... René van Dorst
- Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] dt-bindings: net: et... Matthias Brugger
- Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] dt-bindings: net... David Miller
- Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] dt-bindings:... Matthias Brugger
- [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: Re-... René van Dorst
- [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: Add... René van Dorst
- Aw: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] net: ethernet: mediatek:... Frank Wunderlich
- Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] net: ethernet: mediatek:... David Miller