From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
The subtraction of the two pointers is automatically scaled by the
size of the size of the object the pointers point to, so the division
by sizeof(*i2400m->barker) is incorrect. Fix this by removing the
division. Also make index an unsigned int to clean up a checkpatch
warning.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Extra sizeof expression")
Fixes: aba3792ac2d7 ("wimax/i2400m: rework bootrom initialization to be more
flexible")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
---
drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c
index 489cba9b284d..599a703af6eb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c
@@ -399,8 +399,7 @@ int i2400m_is_boot_barker(struct i2400m *i2400m,
* associated with the device. */
if (i2400m->barker
&& !memcmp(buf, i2400m->barker, sizeof(i2400m->barker->data))) {
- unsigned index = (i2400m->barker - i2400m_barker_db)
- / sizeof(*i2400m->barker);
+ unsigned int index = i2400m->barker - i2400m_barker_db;
d_printf(2, dev, "boot barker cache-confirmed #%u/%08x\n",
index, le32_to_cpu(i2400m->barker->data[0]));
return 0;
--
2.20.1
