On 23.08.2019 01:15, David Miller wrote: > From: Marco Hartmann <marco.hartm...@nxp.com> > Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:00:46 +0000 > >> Commit 34786005eca3 ("net: phy: prevent PHYs w/o Clause 22 regs from calling >> genphy_config_aneg") introduced a check that aborts phy_config_aneg() >> if the phy is a C45 phy. >> This causes phy_state_machine() to call phy_error() so that the phy >> ends up in PHY_HALTED state. >> >> Instead of returning -EOPNOTSUPP, call genphy_c45_config_aneg() >> (analogous to the C22 case) so that the state machine can run >> correctly. >> >> genphy_c45_config_aneg() closely resembles mv3310_config_aneg() >> in drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c, excluding vendor specific >> configurations for 1000BaseT. >> >> Fixes: 22b56e827093 ("net: phy: replace genphy_10g_driver with >> genphy_c45_driver") >> >> Signed-off-by: Marco Hartmann <marco.hartm...@nxp.com> > > Andrew, Heiner, et al. where are we with this patch? > For me this patch would be ok, even though this generic config_aneg doesn't support 1000BaseT. 1. The whole genphy_c45 driver doesn't make sense w/o a config_aneg callback implementation. 2. It can serve as a temporary fallback for new C45 PHY's that don't have a dedicated driver yet. 3. We may have C45 PHYs not supporting 1000BaseT (e.g. T1).
Andrew? Heiner