Hi Marek,
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 21:14:48 +0200, Marek Behún <marek.be...@nic.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is another proposal for supporting setting 2500base-x mode for
> CPU/DSA ports in device tree correctly.
>
> The changes from v1 are that instead of adding .port_setup() and
> .port_teardown() methods to the DSA operations struct we instead, for
> CPU/DSA ports, call dsa_port_enable() from dsa_port_setup(), but only
> after the port is registered (and required phylink/devlink structures
> exist).
>
> The .port_enable/.port_disable methods are now only meant to be used
> for user ports, when the slave interface is brought up/down. This
> proposal changes that in such a way that these methods are also called
> for CPU/DSA ports, but only just after the switch is set up (and just
> before the switch is tore down).
>
> If we went this way, we would have to patch the other DSA drivers to
> check if user port is being given in their respective .port_enable
> and .port_disable implmentations.
>
> What do you think about this?
This looks much better. Let me pass through all patches of this RFC so that
I can include bits I would like to see in your next series.
Thanks,
Vivien
