On 8/16/19 3:26 AM, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> The zc is not used in the xsk part of libbpf, so let us remove it. Not
> good to have dead code lying around.
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karls...@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com> > ---
> tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> index 680e630..9687da9 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ struct xsk_socket {
> int xsks_map_fd;
> __u32 queue_id;
> char ifname[IFNAMSIZ];
> - bool zc;
> };
>
> struct xsk_nl_info {
> @@ -608,8 +607,6 @@ int xsk_socket__create(struct xsk_socket **xsk_ptr, const
> char *ifname,
> goto out_mmap_tx;
> }
>
> - xsk->zc = opts.flags & XDP_OPTIONS_ZEROCOPY;
Since opts.flags usage is removed. Do you think it makes sense to
remove
optlen = sizeof(opts);
err = getsockopt(xsk->fd, SOL_XDP, XDP_OPTIONS, &opts, &optlen);
if (err) {
err = -errno;
goto out_mmap_tx;
}
as well since nobody then uses opts?
> -
> if (!(xsk->config.libbpf_flags & XSK_LIBBPF_FLAGS__INHIBIT_PROG_LOAD)) {
> err = xsk_setup_xdp_prog(xsk);
> if (err)
>
