From: Brett Creeley <brett.cree...@intel.com> When we fail to add/delete MAC filters in the VF, the print doesn't distinguish between the two. Fix that by printing whether or not we failed to add/delete the MAC filter respectively.
Signed-off-by: Brett Creeley <brett.cree...@intel.com> Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bow...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_pf.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_pf.c index 61cf1c5af928..1b1d1ea0c8f9 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_pf.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_pf.c @@ -2283,8 +2283,8 @@ ice_vc_handle_mac_addr_msg(struct ice_vf *vf, u8 *msg, bool set) if (v_ret) { dev_err(&pf->pdev->dev, - "can't update MAC filters for VF %d, error %d\n", - vf->vf_id, v_ret); + "can't %s MAC filters for VF %d, error %d\n", + set ? "add" : "remove", vf->vf_id, v_ret); } else { if (set) vf->num_mac += mac_count; -- 2.21.0