From: Brett Creeley <brett.cree...@intel.com>

When we fail to add/delete MAC filters in the VF, the print doesn't
distinguish between the two. Fix that by printing whether or not we
failed to add/delete the MAC filter respectively.

Signed-off-by: Brett Creeley <brett.cree...@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bow...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_pf.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_pf.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_pf.c
index 61cf1c5af928..1b1d1ea0c8f9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_pf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_pf.c
@@ -2283,8 +2283,8 @@ ice_vc_handle_mac_addr_msg(struct ice_vf *vf, u8 *msg, 
bool set)
 
        if (v_ret) {
                dev_err(&pf->pdev->dev,
-                       "can't update MAC filters for VF %d, error %d\n",
-                       vf->vf_id, v_ret);
+                       "can't %s MAC filters for VF %d, error %d\n",
+                       set ? "add" : "remove", vf->vf_id, v_ret);
        } else {
                if (set)
                        vf->num_mac += mac_count;
-- 
2.21.0

Reply via email to