From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:04:25 +0300
> Based on net/master
I wonder about that because:
> --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> @@ -1451,7 +1451,8 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct
> nlattr *opt,
> spin_unlock_bh(qdisc_lock(sch));
>
> free_sched:
> - kfree(new_admin);
> + if (new_admin)
> + call_rcu(&new_admin->rcu, taprio_free_sched_cb);
>
> return err;
In my tree the context around line 1451 is:
nla_nest_end(skb, sched_nest);
done:
rcu_read_unlock();
return nla_nest_end(skb, nest);
which is part of function taprio_dump().
Please respin this properly against current 'net' sources.
