Found a code comment that needed TLC to correct their formatting.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bow...@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
index bffdea629982..618781b3b7ac 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
@@ -2159,7 +2159,7 @@ static int i40e_vc_config_queues_msg(struct i40e_vf *vf,
u8 *msg)
* VF does not know about these additional VSIs and all
* it cares is about its own queues. PF configures these queues
* to its appropriate VSIs based on TC mapping
- **/
+ */
if (vf->adq_enabled) {
if (idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(vf->ch)) {
aq_ret = I40E_ERR_NO_AVAILABLE_VSI;
--
2.21.0
